London terror attack

This topic has 13 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 2 months ago by Princess.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)

Author

Posts
22/03/2017 at 21:36 #17823
atreestump
Keymaster
What a maniac!

First picture of London terror attack suspect
23/03/2017 at 02:16 #18774
kFoyauextlH
Participant
Sounds or seems to be mentally ill if not a scam.
23/03/2017 at 15:14 #18767
atreestump
Keymaster
This hairstyle is the real act of terror.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
27/03/2017 at 03:48 #18778
Princess
Participant
Motivations?
27/03/2017 at 07:02 #18768
atreestump
Keymaster
For the hair: to try to look like Thatcher

For the ‘terror attack’: Looks like any career criminal who gets pushed over the edge in London, a bad luck day, a few bad looks etc, is enough to push someone to do this.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
27/03/2017 at 20:20 #18775
kFoyauextlH
Participant
Haha really funny commentary.
27/03/2017 at 20:22 #18769
atreestump
Keymaster
I can’t accept this as a terrorist attack, the location is political, but he just looks like a lone looney.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
27/03/2017 at 20:28 #18776
kFoyauextlH
Participant
I felt the same way and I feel one way or another the governments and lobbying groups are behind interpreting or promoting everything towards whatever their ultimate agendas are.
27/03/2017 at 20:30 #18770
atreestump
Keymaster
The agenda is paralysis and fear, they want to take over the middle east and terrorism has become synonymous with it.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
27/03/2017 at 20:44 #18777
kFoyauextlH
Participant
Absolutely. Very excellent truth.
28/03/2017 at 15:08 #18771
Socrates
Participant
Kevin Logan made a good point – hundreds die everyday in Iraq abd Syria due to terrorism, where was their candlelight vigil? This is what gives radical views credence as they know we don’t value their struggle, the media excessively reports and covers the deaths of 4 in London, but not 100-400 per day in Syria.

To me, terrorist means any army that is not authorised by the state.
29/03/2017 at 23:36 #18772
Whisper
Participant
The best way to logically attack them is to use their own definitions of terrorism against them. But then you realize they have started to broaden definitions, and that there is in fact no agreed upon universal definition. Oh, no [emoji44].

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
29/03/2017 at 23:38 #18779
Princess
Participant
I would argue though that the most beneficial definition would have been: any attack against civilians motivated by any general ideological, political, or religious beliefs.
30/03/2017 at 06:56 #18773
notathoughtgiven
Participant
I can’t accept this as a terrorist attack, the location is political, but he just looks like a lone looney.

That is something I can believe more that it is just a lone looney. Someone hoping for attention or misguided.
Author

Posts

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

London terror attack

New Report

Close