[Socrates]

Introduction

Humanity is at a critical point, I am looking for a human being, can we find any left?

What do our spiritual, religious and social beliefs mean if we have no faith left in humanity itself? Can we at least begin to see that placing the blame on one ethnic group or another is completely irrelevant and only serves to enforce our disillusionment of mankind?

How can our governments not take any notice of people drinking and drugging themselves into unconsciousness, selling each other out, excluding everyone who wants to become different? How can people not see that they are invoking the very things they oppose?

It doesn’t matter if you believe in God or not, or if you think the Pleadians are coming to save us, it matters that we first only believe in man.

In the new age, or in normal groups of people, the gig is the same, no faith in mankind is the lowest form of nihilism we can get to, new agers can’t stand anything that may threaten their illusions of certainty and determinism, they are using the same techniques they had before – they are still conditioned, they pretend that things are fixed already and if they pretend, then it will just be okay, but this is alienation and utopian thinking and only leads to making someone the villain, the new serpent, the one or the group who doesn’t fit into the ideal.

I am now a master of suspicion, not only of those who talk of other worldly values and ideals, but also of those that originate out of no belief in man kind, if we can’t accept humanity, then what is there to build on? You are a human being, get over it…as your values are not even in another world and definitely are not part of this one, they are in a “no-place” for those who only say “no” and that “NO” becomes their sole source of creativity – a no-place is No-where, that is a Utopia.

They don’t want the truth or the solutions, they just want to know who is lying to them, they will follow the discrediting man and then follow the one after him, with each step is new thing to memorize, but I don’t want to memorize, I want to never forget and that my friends comes only from understanding – that is the only way to identify with truth.

Those who take the literal path of looking at the universe as vibration fail to see the truth before them, that if sound is the power of the cosmos, then language is greater than we and indeed words are greater than we and we will never transcend language – language gives us the study of what is.
 

 
Preface
This work should not be viewed as an academic work as such; it is my personal experience of some of the heated debates and activities on the internet regarding spirituality, religion, politics and the many movements that criticize these ideals and look towards solutions.
It doesn’t take even the layman long to understand that there are some incredible misunderstandings and fallacies within these communities online and that the medium that can bring forth true power to humanity, is being dogmatized and even intercepted by established ideals that offer certainties and safety, however the issues are never addressed correctly and the true spirit of this medium is being lost.
 
I have refrained from being prescriptive and decided to stick to the action of provocation for the remainder of the book.
 
 
Of Indirect Avoidance
Let this be a direct message, for that is our only obligation, to those who call themselves a “messenger”, or worse, the deluded arrogant intention of humility that is “just a messenger”! I speak directly to myself and from myself and therefore own my message; the bearer of any message must acknowledge this responsibility! There are non-weaker than the messenger who acts out of learned indirect conveyance that operates avoidance of taking responsibility to address “truth” to the one who is accused of “untruth” and it is nothing more than a stalling of knowledge. If you can’t own your accepted duty as part of the “greater than”, as you call it, then don’t pity yourself and me when you display your weakness upon my disproval – for you are addressing a living creature who wants the compassionate focus of the search for truth as the TOP priority and may there be no higher and greater than, than truth alone.. You are not the first and you will be not the last, but the crossing of paths with a direct being that owns the responsibility of disagreement in the message, will be your opportunity to become your valued greater, to what I call truth. Listen carefully O messenger of indirectness, for there is no such thing as the way, there is only my way…ownership of Daoism is the first step to realistically achieving your desire, but you must first listen to your own message…

“Don’t shoot the messenger”, I hear your wishes in your breath, full of pity and lack of wealth in knowledge, but with a need for the approval to transcend alienation – take your responsibility fellow messenger, as not the messenger, but the participant of the truth you are enforcing to up-hold, save your breath of wishes for pity and spared alienation, for truth is your opportunity – it liberates your respiration.
 
 
Of Penetralian Prophets

Let us partake in the presumption of prior meaning to existence and the new presumption that it does not have this catalyst. For too long mankind has deceived and undermined his experience and perspective by making the cosmos one with him and not only that, but by making the cosmos him himself. Let us be devoid of ignorance when addressing this to the macro and microcosm that we believe or claim to know is trying to teach us something in the very same language we created to describe it with, “in order to” and “for the purpose of” and of course “BECAUSE” – let this teleology be the smallest distraction from this affair as we begin to embrace the autopoietic individual we call ourselves that is yet to be.

The Penetralia of being is what the presumptuous and prophetic man declares as the authority of the prior purpose – that when all is broken down with science that attempts to prove the holy, there is but the molecule! Amazed are the reciprocal believers at marking the objective as our primary source of meaning, but to the autopoietic species that is yet to become, the subjective will prevail above the teleological self organization of this Penetralia!

I accept that we are one! The very being of the cosmos is derived from the interconnectedness of the atom, molecule or particle, however this does NOT mean that there is any basis of fact that there is one singular ordering principle – it means we are made of the same substance and that is all, however don’t feel that you are at a loss, as you have lost nothing.

The paradoxes in the subatomic world obey none of the laws we measure within our physical world of atoms, if above is the intelligible and the below is the sensible, then we see no reason to think that there can be prior purpose.

Beware of the Penetralian prophets and holy scientists, with their loss of observation of this world – the measurement problem is indeed interesting! For the Penetralia of being, the cosmos, the universe, has a purpose and no purpose at the same time! Let that be the first solution for your journey to strip your conditions.
 
Of Valuable Becoming

“Pointless!” and “Absurd is your suggestion!” I hear the “love of wisdom” and of “knowledge” populous say! “Why are you not taking our side against the believers of faiths, or the scientific dogmatists?” – “These are finally the first becomings“, I say in reply!
Let us not dwell in the waste of energy and therefore not pick a fight in agreeable debate with those who choose “theist” or “atheist”, for the questions I have are unspeakable even to these and many others…

What I seek is the ground work of desires for that is the basis of valuable becoming! Strip away the ideal and sentimental for the prior and begin to see each moment as the dawn of existence…

Eternity is waiting for you here and now, can’t you taste it with you every waking breath, of which lies your own liberation? To this you can answer either “yes” or “no” – the greatest journey of man is not to “rise”, “ascend” or to “wait”, these are neither virtues nor tasks! True virtue lies in the truth of your every waking moment – your task is to see it is complete, salvation is not required! – perception is your only boundary and the autopoietic individual is awaiting destruction and creation by your move from “no thank you eternity” to “yes please to all” – as one “yes”, will open up a limitless succession of affirmation… However… we have much, much more to cover on our journey, but all I ask is that you begin to speak for yourself, by speaking from yourself and to yourself – the subjective is the source of your desire for valuable becoming….

Now that we are acquainted, breathing together, some easier and more “expansive and compressive” than others, we must begin to address the issue of unity.

“Oneness” also prescribed as the sickening phonetic of “At-one-ment” that places the value of the desire of becoming in the very thing you do not speak from and that is what is within the mind! We must go on! Breathe in…Breathe out…eternity is here as we breathe and so is your liberation.

If there be only one mind, whether it divine, or some marking of the objective by the holy scientists and dogmatists who oppose nothing of what they speak of without their insane lust for power and control to avoid alienation, be aware that they preach Penetralia! With their catalytic presumption that is a matter of personal desire and not what is written in the atom! Begin to see their teleology, of how he makes himself the universe with the language we created. However the value of this perspective is not to be treated as invaluable.

The anonymous, the caller over the phone, maybe a white telephone of teleology! is responsible for our lack of speaking from and to ourselves and then to others… that the alienated, Penetralia prophets of the one mind, who respect nothing of this mind or anything that is not a marking of the objective to clarify the existence of the divine, have nothing to say, they have nothing to say of valuable becoming.

What is freedom of speech if you can’t speak without anonymous representation? Is this not the foundation of “lose the name, don’t play the game”?

The ego, let’s look at it, the invisible concept that is exempt from occupation of time and space, it is as visible as the words you confuse with vibration, if there is an ordering principle and original prior purpose, then why do you exclude this creation as evil? As the ego is the concept that the individual requires to be such an agency, you say “no” to eternity – this creative negation of truth is blown away by your idealism of unification! That you Penetralian prophets refuse to accept that through their lack of observation, they have begun to label (which is to say, they are naming) the use of negative action as “anonymous” and thus they will drown in their watery phantasms of unity without eternity in their hearts…

Empathy is the only drive we need to form a valuable becoming and overcoming, the ego does not equate to evil conditions and unity in your breath gives off the rotting smell of uniformity to ideal. Empathy is “feeling ones’ way into…”, there has to be another with their own values and drives to be heard! Not just your greater good of unity and anonyminity – the autopoietic, super-subjective individual will stand fearlessly, as fear is a creation of subjectivity – it is therefore belief! May the power of belief prevail when we stand for what we ourselves believe in, but we must first ask what that is… what is truth?
 
Of Verba Aeternam and the Silens Sonus

Why do you seek the mark of the objective? What does it matter? Most that seek to brand and mark out the objective truth often wave the ideal with it too. Why do we need a map, or a physical and irrefutable proof for the existence of your cause, be it divine or scientific? Should the existence and ontology really be an issue in our current condition?

What of your molecular brothers and sisters, would you leave them behind for the word of a particle with a map into a cloud of nebulae that says “heaven is here”? For the issue of existence of divinity, is not one that can bring forth the values of a direct interaction between us.

It is the medium of modern technology, the marvel of the internet, which is the facility for this valuable becoming, however it has become accustomed to our habits of historicity, masculine bullet points and causation and the informing spirit is being relented by our reluctance to transcend our vulnerabilities.

To place such emphasis on “breath” is to embrace all that is associated with this involuntary obligation. Just as breath does not exist without lung, neither does word without speech, however the fixation on the marking of the objective has led the penetralian prophets astray.

Vibration, octaves and even the exaggeration of light and sound waves being the objective truth have been confused with our language. To say that a race that has long since vanished from existence and of whom will hold no standard of value to our own hath spoken a verba aeternam[1]  that has indicium potestas[2], is to offer yet another avenue of unbecoming. How escapist of the penetralian prophets to in one breath speak of words as the source of wisdom, that by connecting the sound waves that help to transmit the intangible symbols to the reciprocal believer! Verba virtutem aeternam [3] has no occupation in space time, for the sounds are not one with the words – this cannot be marked as the objective, as the symbols of a language are a purely subjective concept.

[1] “Eternal Word” [2] “sign, evidence, reward, proof of power and a kingdom”[3] “Eternal words of power”

The next breath that they take will exclude (as it is impossible to include without excluding) is one of rejecting any creation of the mind they call upon. The issue lies within the inability to value subjectivity, as this my friends, would lead us directly to motive, value and ultimately, to vulnerability.

What have I been calling to you? Have you not heard it while inhaling and exhaling? Only you can hear this sound, this sound that can make no noise without your own command, giving us the illusion of sound and language being one, for it is the excluded breath that I encourage you to listen to.

Who is to present a valid reason that subjectivity is less valuable than objectivity? Why do we need such certainty? Ask the silens sonus [4] within you a question it will be unable not to answer!  Before you ask yourself, recall what it is that you want to hear.

[4] “Silent Sound”

If the power is not of an object, be it sound or light, rock, paper, or scroll; does your value of humanity grow less or stay the same by this possibility and paradox that hinges only on your own desire not to accept anything less than an object to tell you how to value your reality?

This of course is easily answered once we begin to look at why the verba aeternam is sought after as an object of truth.
Established and fixed are our views of nature in this ideal mindset, that if the truth has been lost and we need to “open up” for an “emanation” of this truth by heightening our vibrations to hear the words that we will never hear from anywhere but our valuable subjectivity, will hopefully, somehow, show us an empirical reason for our existence – that there is a watchmaker and it has placed us in a determined watch mechanism.

It was all an experiment! That’s it! Never ceased to be amazed at how teleology has been a curse to man for too long now… How can there be a “knowing “prior to “thinking”? This is where our “’ologies” need to be addressed for certain.

How can anything be ontological, when we need language in order to describe it?  The marking of the objective is to seek that stone of the philosopher that holds the key to our being, that Penetralia that can show us the way, however it is our epistemology that gives us our ontology and our drive to have communion with each other that has only the link of intangible symbols that we falsely believe are the sound waves that occupy space and time, has led us to the search of this indicium potestas – philosophy happens after the fact, existence precedes the essence and therefore epistemology creates the ontology.

Thus we need to distinguish the process from the object. “What is” is not the same as the “study of what is”, this blend of subjectivity and objectivity while providing explanatory value only to the objective has to be addressed and understood.

Claiming that sound is word is one such example of hiding the subjective in this way – moving away from literal translation is one step, however this is not to say the completion that is sought after is anywhere near achieved, old habits and dogma are just beginning.
The formula of “Yod Heh Vav Heh” is exactly what is says it is, it is a representation of form, not the actual. The action of viewing the cosmos as the creation of a divine verba aeternam is quite clearly epistemological and not ontological, physicists of recent times attempted to place the elements into an octave scale, however this was by means of explanatory value and not to attempt to say that the universe is the work of a composition, however with ideas such as the “big bang” and religion explaining that in the beginning was the “word”, indicating yet again the confusion of object and subject in space time, it’s hard to say for sure what intentions are for these perspectives  in the actual…
 
Of Advancing Avoidance and Technology

The issues of beginning discussions of this sort are numerous, as a discussion about the discussion will probably be all that we encounter before a point is made; however in recent times with the assistance of technology and faster communication mediums, mankind has discovered a new way to add to the delay of points being made! Firstly, the choice of medium is to be discussed, before discussing the discussion that may hopefully lead to the discussion of points, this of course is not easy, as preference of medium of communication is not always mutually agreeable and therefore we have to add the next infinite regress to this fallacy caused by defense and dogma.

Task: Discuss the medium that would best facilitate a “discussion”

o   discuss changing the medium over the disagreement of medium and how the chosen medium would not suit the discussion of the discussion
o   then the variable of the medium being used finally, however once either side begins to suffer a loss during the discussion, the discussion of the medium is bought up again and may go back to the previous two discussions of medium
o   hopefully, the most fortunate of us who ask the alienating questions of “why” in this world will eventually get to the context of the discussion, but this of course takes us back to the intention of only discussing the way we shall discuss, rather than getting to any discussion with points being made, which is unfortunately the furthest I get with most
o   This is rare, but this is the stage of points being made and finally discussed, however regress can occur at this point and may go back to at least the last issue.
 
As you can see and I am sure everyone has experienced these issues, people will avoid any type of discussion and will avoid it even more if it becomes easier to begin the discussion. My point being that in the modern age, we have the ability to pile intelligence upon intelligence and ability upon ability by means of feedback – to go beyond self organization from set values of certainties to the neo-human stage of intellect, in particular philosophy – this, friend, is the stage of the autopoietic individual.
 
It makes me sad to see the only blockage is vulnerability and convenience. As communication is faster and easier, people can not only begin conversations immediately, they can also avoid them easily and easier too. We may have shrunk the world by means of communication; however we have lost our direct experience with each other, as we only see the screen that conveys the language of the intended encoder or decoder of the message, just words, or the digital interpretation of their form, or we encounter only a clay model of an experiment in identity that only speaks out anonymously, just an image that both encoder and decoder can choose to switch off with a button, or ignore by blaming the medium for malfunction at any moment and we have wasted many of these urgent moments. Urgency delays agency, concerns over invasion of privacy outweigh the logic of introducing high speed portable communication mediums and is yet another regression – this list is not complete and we believe we are running out of time for humanity.
 
The closer we get to bringing us all together, the further away they seem to go from us. Truth, when in its’ state of recognition, is conveyed without shame or avoidance, it is liberally given and received as an externalization of uncertainty, vulnerability and anticipation, only with the condition that it be heard and considered, but this is getting much more out of reach and humanity is losing its’ touch with itself and without touch, each breath is suffocating and not liberating.
 
Of Our Simple Truth
 
Truth, what is it? That is our question and my answer is one that will cause you to answer another you will not be able to resist.
 
Truth is something that we can never forget and never escape from.
 
Discussions, points and concepts aside, we should be ashamed of how we have avoided the simple truths of our existence and have tried to escape from them and even created institutions of matter to mirror our ignorance – we make criminals, victims and martyrs of those who don’t fit the ideal, we give them things that they can’t forget and put them in places they can’t escape from, however the simple truths are avoided – as the simplest truth, is that our life is about people and relationships and this is what we can’t escape from and we can never forget, but we sure try!
 
Without these interactions for the feedback of truth to enhance the complexity of our intelligence and ability, what does our “word” mean? What does “mean” mean? It is a question of value. The word, the sound, the concept, the Penetralia of being is always based on what we value, that s the ingredient for the epistemic process.
 
The medium of the internet has every potential (I am prescribing an imperative here) to adapt to our environment, but it seems we need to adapt to the environment of ourselves first. The passive observations of meditation, prayer and hope confused with certainty is another regress from the action, just like the hunt for “x” marks the object of truth, we can add another layer to the distance between understanding each other and yet another autocratic medium to take care of what we can’t confront ourselves – we are creating our own prisons of the mind and gladly finding ways to cope and not change our ways.
 
The only answer lies in the very principle of ressentiment becoming creative of these values. We avoid interaction, even when interaction is easier than it ever has been and all because of our laziness and fear, which is technically the same term, of the creations of power from the top down.
It is important to us, my friends, to realize that our experience is the most valuable to us and is possibly and impossibly at the same time, all the time we have, depending on our measurement epistemologically using our values!
 
The experience however, does not have to translate into the external, as has been the issue in time gone by. Take for instance Sri Nataraja and the dwarf of ignorance, Apasmara.  Sri Nataraja dances in the eternal flames of both creation and destruction while  standing on the dwarf demon, representing knowledge and ignorance, a truth that depicts every moment of our waking life whereby as knowledge expands, ignorance does too and change is the constant for us all.
 
There is no ending, there can only be the process of thought that can be achieved in the present, no teleology that gives us the dangled carrot of completion, the overcoming of vulnerability and finally power of those who are not as complete, this is our error and is the source of our illusion of pressure to respond – our fear and laziness that has almost laid to waste the mediums of communication.
 
Although we translate these mystical myths that represent the cosmos in a metaphysical way, we fail to first acknowledge that we are the ones describing this eternal process, which is why we refuse eternity in the here and now, ultimately – they are given a higher value when we compare them to our subject to subject experience.
 
Of Imminent Unbecoming
 
Our experience is conveniently ignored when presenting teleology and eschatology, the fall of some kingdom or other to make way for the indicium potestas, however this is far too engrained into our reasoning whereby there is a time and date for this change to occur and that we don’t have to face our responsibilities until the change occurs due to the ordering principle, to which the real principle lies in ressentiment creating our values of “beginning and end”, “completion”, which gives us the false impression that “eternal” has no purpose, that if something is going on forever, we don’t value it, there has to be an urgency to everything we observe and experience. Absurd as it sounds, which is an understatement, as we freeze with inaction under this process of imminent unbecoming, however our values place the universe in the same rank as a time bomb, waiting to explode out of existence, the same way we describe it became!
 
Sickness, fear, laziness, urgency, inaction, avoidance, escape, forgetting while remembering, regress, object and subject as one and object the more valuable… this is our mindset and all we have to do is let go of time and see what we always see – which is the right now.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SECTION TWO
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Of Subjective Valuation
 
Overall, our values, in particular regarding our subjective classifications, need to be derived from human expression before evaluating the external for truth, the very issues I have presented regarding communication and the advances that have only served to relent our desire for spiritual communion via the intangible symbols of language, show us that subjectivity is only relegated in explanatory value as we have barely anything to like about ourselves and humanity in general, that although we crave the answers and solutions to alienation, the conflict between that search and the ongoing creation of alienation in society and that we have the means to overcome it,  we still prefer values that are not founded upon our own experience.
 
The verba aeternam will not be relative to us in our complexity, the past has nothing to say to us as regards how to communicate and expand, it only serves to set an example of how long it has been since ideals were set and never achieved – thus giving us the illusion that we have got it all wrong, and that the truth is still out there somehow, this is nothing more than an enforcement of a rejection of evolution of the human species, a refusal to accept that at one time man was a free animal among hunter gather-tribes. Alien dualities of good and evil serve to assume that we have been nothing but those who serve others.
 
Personal preference is one of the most common associations with subjectivity, however we still refuse to accept that the majority of the time, we metaphysically describe our reality – we have already decided what the object is and then we set out to prove it. The distinction needs to be made clearer between our actions and chaos and complexity in other organisms that are around us.
 
Such examples are things like “potential”, “causality”, “emergence”, “form”, “free will”, “meaning”, “mind”, “modality”, “nothing”, “objects”, “principles”, “reality”, “self”, “time”, “truth” and “value” – these are all metaphysical and difficult to avoid, in fact practically impossible to avoid and that ultimately the question of what “being” is and what “the being” is, has been a topic of some debate since Derrida, as he pointed out that “being” is pretty much another word for “essence” or “God”, it’s just that philosophers have attempted to move towards the “I” since Descartes, as the individual wasn’t much of a concept, all previous values created around the time of Aristotle and Plato, were oriented toward “state” as the organism at the head of the being, we can clearly see from these types of metaphysics that man is the measure of state and state is God.
 
A fantastic challenger of whom I interact with online, a certain Mr. Danny Wilten, has provided perspectives on this occurrence, that the macrocosm and microcosm of man as the universe has even been included in the building of temples across the world, in order to give the most concrete objective appearance of the divine in the form we know best – man.
 
It only serves to add more of the unworthy notion that encourages indirectness and lack of responsibility by marking the objective in this way, in the same relative fashion of the New Testament, a man appears of who is claimed to be the son of God and is God in mans’ form – yet another example of the universe being made into man, yet at the same time illustrating the possibility that man has low comprehension of powers above him, however there is another perspective to note, when we begin to value the subjective as the cause of metaphysics – that what we understand about the divine is absolute and complete, as it comes from our understanding, man is not just the measure, man is the also the measurer.
 
 
 
Of the Monism of Fear and Laziness
 
“Word” as the intangible, “sound” as the wave that can occupy space time, have been equated to “light” and “good” and therefore,  as nothing short of action, we are marking the objective not just with value, but with the search of verb too.
 
All that this means in the highest objective terms is that we can never transcend language in our existence when it comes to experience of humanity, however we would be deceiving ourselves if we didn’t acknowledge how influential words are and our experience of them indicates that they are indeed greater than man, but a creation of him, nonetheless…
 
However, if the good is connected with action via a word translated as verb, then why is it that this very same adored object that is marked is seldom used by those who worship it? The delays in the use of the adored word and feedback only serves to allow universalism to bind them, up to the point that the objective becomes indistinguishable from the subjective – again, the product of our fear and laziness.
 
Have you not questioned the fear and the laziness? Its usage and reference seems to be the first question you would like to avoid answering and may just avoid still – I hold no hopes here. Is it entirely possible that they mean the very same thing?
 
Of the Test
 
It is often a curious observation that is made by those who hear my thoughts who claim I am a spiritual person who has managed to achieve the goals of other paradigms that seem to leave the ideal out of reach to those who practice them. Ask yourselves why you think this. Is it because I appear vulnerable, but at the same time able to address this vulnerability to the world without anonyminity?
The main confusions have been outlined in previous chapters; however the main problem is the matter of where does the individual come into our existence with its radical new subjectivity?

The external still holds much of the influence over communications, social media etc, as the image we see on a profile on these mediums, requires many conditions to be perpetuated, voyeurism is on the increase, celebrity sympathy is also on the rise, due to this auto-paparazzi culture on the internet.
 
The most interesting experiments that flow with feedback of communication truth are those where the platform is anonymous, 4Chan is one such interesting platform, as users of this medium can play with their “putty” persona and not have their true persona suffer the consequences of exposure to the external, such as work colleagues and peers online.

Facebook however is becoming a giant animated CV of experimentation for reaction of the external, it was on this medium that I discovered many of the facades that humanity plays out and how the projection of a vulnerability, however in my case as a transvestite who openly came out of the closet in real time and continued to ask questions regarding the human condition at the same time, the reaction was full of many valuable responses!
 
It was this autopoietic action that gave me an advantage, as knowledge is the process and platform, but ultimately knowledge is used for power.
 
I needed to know if the people around me at the time were being genuine, or if it was a public relations stunt, however there was also many personal reasons – for the want of a community that can accept freedom of expression for example, which I believed was entirely more probable than what actually happened when I came out, so I took the opportunity to see what growth (if any) could occur.

This is what will be my own perspective on how to transcend the cogs of restrictions in life – that part of us that requires a little more action and less theory, as you have noticed with all of my work, I am not just looking for ideas that fit on paper, I am looking for ways of living that are dynamic and not dogmatic.

There are those who are instantly disgusted by my choices, however the responses when I ask “why” are either avoided, due to habitual morality, or I am given “advice” about “being taken seriously” and of course, the classic “just be you”.

Vulnerabilities are rife online, the movements of the freeman on the land have this ideal of losing a name to have rights in this world, which I can now see is a direct result of the anonymous action online – that no one will stand up for what they are, without hiding behind a created persona.

The truth is however, which is to say, what they can’t forget and what they can’t escape from, is that they can’t act out their ideals and of course this will always lead us back to problems such as slave morality, ressentiment and a kind of Marxist view of power.
Their sympathies lie with those experiences they can never know and they are thriving in deceptive ideas they are not willing to test!
This is not the autopoietic process of course, this is everything that can prevent it, but I will outline that there are those who willingly try to accept others for being who they want to be and will address them directly to gain their perspective and these people are one in a million.

I can’t guarantee that you will be able to relate to my actions and ideas, but you will be able to relate to your own, I want you to read and re-read these words and really listen to your inner world – the answer is not waiting in a verba aeternam, or a promised sign or kingdom, aliens are a symptom of alienation and a lack of direct human experience.

You will need faith in man before you can begin to value your reality and this comes only from actions of your own – the autopoietic individual not only responds to the environment, this individual is able to change the environment is responds to. There is nothing mystical about it – it all comes from your own experience. I will leave you with a provocative quip:

There is no such thing as a divide in class, only the divide of the nerves to take action.

Overall, unity has a historic reputation for eradicating perspective and individuality, it’s not “divide and conquer”, it is “strength through unity” that destroys humanity, as it will always try to bind itself to something that makes him imperfect, not realizing that the way the perfection is described is that of his own form to begin with.
 
 
 

[Author]

Posts