[kFoyauextlH]

The Key is Can. Not is, was, will be.

So one can say. Such and such can be interpreted as and can be made mean such and such. Not this Is such and such, or this certainly was or definitely will be such and such.

The plus symbol can be used as a reminder of thiis and this and this. Not it can’t. Not it won’t. Not shouldn’t be or should be.

Can is the Key.

How can you use a thing? An idea. A tool. Anything at all in any dimension of it?

It can be used to remind one of this, it can be placed like this and put towards this, it can do so many things.

Can is the skeleton key, the master key, in what ways Can?

[Whisper]

I’ve noticed this, especially as I explain to my roommate spiritual truths through 10 different theologies in the course of one conversation

[kFoyauextlH]

Haha yeah! Can is a good shield too. They might find it difficult to accuse us of the terrible crime of being made insane, if we are simply saying Can. Not have to, not must. You can take it this way. It can be made to mean this. It doesn’t matter if Did, if Wasn’t, if anything else but Can. All those other things are fallacious sorts of things people obsess about.

Did the medieval person Really think this so that in my re-creation of it for myself I am restricted to just what I imagine someone in my imagination thought to make it alright for me?

I have heard and seen so many strange things and so much strange reasoning.

The world and all that is in it, the heavens and the Earth and the Reality and all the dimensions of mind and thought and toys and adventure and videos and whatever we call fake and real and bad and good are All there.

All there but what? The Key is Can. How can we use them to our advantage and benefit and enjoyment.

I can say this. I can take it to remind me of that.

Why should I worry about things I can never have? Like what a medieval person certainly thought or did? All that has any relevance is Can for opening doors and gateways and understanding things in multifaceted ways.

[Rubsy]

The question is why do we worry about what it was like to be a Medieval mind ? What answers are we looking for, by contrasting ourselves to them ? The medievals looked back to the Romans, the Victorians to the Medievals and we too everyage. What does that say about us? The word is ‘nostalgia’ a sadness for something missing, something that is no longer there.

[kFoyauextlH]

That is a very cool thought. I was just using the medieval thing as an example and relating it to people like pagan re-constructionists who tend to limit themselves based on their own imaginations and available data rather than thinking of people and possibilities when it comes to our own practices, not about history or the study of archeology and things like that, but that when it comes to putting things to use, even the most mundane things that are often taken for granted like a wall or a smudge on the wall, it becomes irrelevant what anyone else may have thought of it but most pertinent what we could be reminded of by such or how and in what ways we Can use it.
[hr]

[hr]
For example in the above video, we can concern ourselves with what Aloe Blacc may mean or intend, but we can also take more from it where it doesn’t matter what Aloe Blacc meant, for example he says a line likely to be taken for granted where he mentions Name. I can take that as a reminder of my Name theme that I have been talking about and made a thread regarding.

[Author]

Posts