
@atreestump
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
12/05/2017 at 20:46 #19311
atreestump
KeymasterI will have to revisit the subject, will try for later this week. It’s worth opening up a thread for.
12/05/2017 at 20:43 #19310atreestump
KeymasterOpen up a new thread in general discussion.
12/05/2017 at 20:41 #18841atreestump
Keymaster12/05/2017 at 20:22 #19309atreestump
KeymasterAccelerationism is a term used to describe a general mindset of progress and is heavily laden with scientism which is an overinflated faith in the scientific method as the only way to solve all of the worlds problems.
[hr]
Well, that’s one of the most problematic aspects of it anyway, it is still yet to be fully defined.12/05/2017 at 19:42 #19304atreestump
Keymasterhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMRaoluQ2wE
[hr]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prometheanism
[hr]
Still looks like Humanism to me.12/05/2017 at 18:55 #19303atreestump
KeymasterAs regards the PDF – there’s an interesting part about CCRU and Nick Land of Warwick, who wanted to dissolve the form of the subject and fully immerse into a post-human delerious state of capital itself, which went along with discussions of the New Right and what the author of the PDF terms Deleuzean Thatcherism!
That is interesting, as there was a huge movement from the right online that promoted the whole ‘dissolve the ego’ element, which sounded really spiritual and enlightening, but seems to have led the masses into a forced schizophrenia of sorts that fully accepts capital as the way to go.
12/05/2017 at 16:36 #19368atreestump
KeymasterGreat first go at it @”DAWN” !
In philosophy jargon, what you just said here means that beauty is relative, in the eyes of the beholder so to speak. This means there is no thing-in-itself which is beautiful absolutely.
I see the living of life as a work of art and that if one embraces the artistic life, that is beautiful.
12/05/2017 at 16:03 #19302atreestump
KeymasterI like the move to the left that is in the Guardian article:
“Capitalism has begun to constrain the productive forces of technology,” they wrote. “[Our version of] accelerationism is the basic belief that these capacities can and should be let loose … repurposed towards common ends … towards an alternative modernity.”
I would exchange ends for means here, but in essence, the world we were promised is radically different to the one we have in regards to technology. It was supposed to free us up.
12/05/2017 at 14:03 #19288atreestump
KeymasterThe powers of horror is well worth a read by Julia Kristeva
12/05/2017 at 13:13 #19297atreestump
KeymasterI think the view that capitalism will collapse due to inherent contradictions is very wishful thinking and it seems like alienation, while inevitable, is a state we are having to swallow in the same way that neoliberal ideological axioms are swallowed, i.e. ‘greed is good’.
[hr]
Dostoyevsky is important here – man is an animal that can get used to anything.12/05/2017 at 12:18 #19273atreestump
KeymasterWhat’s the long term plan for these commodity-currencies?
[hr]
The reason I ask is because it looks like a bubble is building here.12/05/2017 at 07:24 #19322atreestump
KeymasterAbject as a protection
It’s biological expression is one of nausea and disgust, anxiety and spasms. It protects us from what we loathe. We spit ourselves out. Food loathing is perhaps the best example of the abject. Jellied eels are a common delicacy in some London pubs, just watching others scoff and swallow those slimy, gross eels with a pint of lager makes me wretch and purge. When I can’t hide my repulsion from others, they seek to proffer the loathed food and I refuse. ‘I’ do not want to listen.’I’ refuse to assimilate it. ‘I’ expell it.
To each ego it’s object, to each superego, it’s abject.
A corpse is another way of understanding abjection, a corpse shows you the boundary of life itself, what we push aside in order to live.
This is negation as necessity.
12/05/2017 at 06:49 #19287atreestump
KeymasterAbjection, we are defined through negation (what we are not) and bodily excretions are the same as the way we individuate. A whole necessarily expressing separateness.
11/05/2017 at 18:54 #19283atreestump
KeymasterLocke holds that the use of force by the state to get people to hold certain beliefs or engage in certain ceremonies or practices is illegitimate. The chief means which the magistrate has at her disposal is force, but force is not an effective means for changing or maintaining belief. Suppose then, that the magistrate uses force so as to make people profess that they believe.
10/05/2017 at 23:20 #19182atreestump
KeymasterThought you might find Heirophany interesting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierophany?wprov=sfsi1
-
AuthorPosts