[Whisper]

Are you implying that corporate activities are exploitation? I find that to be untrue in both research groups and groups of artists and architects. Otherwise yes profit as a teleology comes through monopolizing as a means I agree.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Whisper]

I disagree with him. Keep onwards with your readings and studyings whether at a university or at home. I don’t believe it matters as we are all trying to discern truth from the same writings, not force feeding students an interpretation (unless it is a lecture only class but that is unheard of here).

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Whisper]

Capitalism always becomes corporate – shame how it’s become a reality.

Why does capitalism always become corporate? Moreover, what human activities aren’t fundamentally corporate?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Whisper]

Which companies are you referring to?

https://www.google.com/amp/www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/amp/nba-pulls-all-star-game-out-charlotte-over-hb2-n614466

http://money.cnn.com/2016/08/17/news/companies/target-bathroom-transgender/

Corporate bodies are just bodies of people, neither good nor bad. I just find they are too entitled to special privileges. Others like my dad asserts a keynesian model of cooperation between responsible corporations and a socialized state.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Whisper]

Profit can be more freely redistributed under anarcho anarchism than possible with statist capitalism

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[hr]
Part of this is small scale resource bargaining in primitivist societies but the threat of rebuilding is why I see anarcho capitalism as under the threat of rebuilding to corporate capitalism.

Also crypto anarchist systems of capitalism on the web I see as becoming corporate such as trafficking guns drugs and human beings

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Whisper]

So be it, perhaps companies don’t need regulation. I thought anarchism is against authority. Decentralized decision making is a good thing perhaps. It’s not about work ethic, it’s about strategy. If it was about work ethic the lower classes and mexican immigrants would be better off than they are.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Whisper]

Those seem like really extreme arguments, that you have brought up, Ontical

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[hr]

Because fascism is pretty good at what it does. It’s obviously preferable. In wartime it can guarantee expansion and gaining / stealing resources. The only way land rights have such absolute meaning is through government.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What about companies with a public image to maintain? What about companies which defend people against domination, trans people? There are also a few companies that defend privacy although I do find things increasingly panoptic with many of them.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Whisper]

The best way to logically attack them is to use their own definitions of terrorism against them. But then you realize they have started to broaden definitions, and that there is in fact no agreed upon universal definition. Oh, no [emoji44].

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Whisper]

If anyone has any thoughts on this belief system or related ones, feel free to share. I hold this close to my dear heart.

[Whisper]

Well lets have an answer for both, or a way to connect the two.

It’s interesting that you end up with more questions as you answer it though.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Because the asker has not clarified what they mean by life

I have multiple interpretations of what life is based on systems of thought

Life might have categories if the answer is not reduced to absurdity

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Whisper]

Why not go for mutual exchange? I don’t get how there would be no profit.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Humans find ways to maximize self interest

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Whisper]

The question means nothing. Are you searching for as: a descriptive definition of biological life, a descriptive definition of human life, or a teleological focus of human life? Since I was a damn young teenager I’ve been answering this question with more questions to the asker.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Whisper]

Maybe Anarcho Capitalism has some legitimate basis in the idea that goods tend to be exchanged? Not defending private property as land rights, but rather resources.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Whisper]

I wrote about Time today or linked to it through an Islam Hate thread on Wizard Forums by mentioning Mahakala or Kal.

What do ye have to say aboot that?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Whisper]

“Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you”
Masamune Shirow, Ghost in the shell.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Author]

Posts